CIPP-US INSTANT ACCESS & VALID DUMPS CIPP-US PPT

CIPP-US Instant Access & Valid Dumps CIPP-US Ppt

CIPP-US Instant Access & Valid Dumps CIPP-US Ppt

Blog Article

Tags: CIPP-US Instant Access, Valid Dumps CIPP-US Ppt, Certification CIPP-US Torrent, CIPP-US Pass Guarantee, CIPP-US Exam Questions Answers

2025 Latest ActualTestsQuiz CIPP-US PDF Dumps and CIPP-US Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NFfgoEDJl0YKQLHbjkNOiuP01eDdg0qK

ActualTestsQuiz offers accurate and reliable study materials to help you prepare for the IAPP CIPP-US Exam. They have prepared the best IAPP CIPP-US Exam Questions that provide authentic and reliable material. With ActualTestsQuiz, many candidates have succeeded in passing the IAPP CIPP-US Exam.

The CIPP-US certification exam consists of 90 multiple-choice questions, and candidates are given 2.5 hours to complete the exam. The questions are designed to test the candidate's knowledge and understanding of the US privacy laws and regulations, as well as their ability to apply this knowledge in real-world scenarios. CIPP-US exam is administered by Pearson VUE, and candidates can take the exam at any of the Pearson VUE testing centers worldwide.

In order to earn the CIPP/US certification, individuals must pass a rigorous exam that tests their knowledge and understanding of privacy laws and regulations in the United States. CIPP-US Exam is designed to be challenging, but individuals who prepare thoroughly and have a strong understanding of the material should be able to pass the exam and earn the certification.

>> CIPP-US Instant Access <<

Get Valid CIPP-US Instant Access and Excellent Valid Dumps CIPP-US Ppt

Not only our IAPP CIPP-US study guide has the advantage of high-quality, but also has reasonable prices that are accessible for every one of you. So it is incumbent upon us to support you. On the other side, we know the consumers are vulnerable for many exam candidates are susceptible to ads that boost about IAPP CIPP-US skills their practice with low quality which may confuse exam candidates like you, so we are trying hard to promote our high quality CIPP-US study guide to more people.

The CIPP-US Certification is ideal for professionals who work in the field of privacy, including privacy officers, data protection officers, compliance officers, and data security professionals. Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States (CIPP/US) certification is also beneficial for lawyers, consultants, and other professionals who work with privacy laws and regulations.

IAPP Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States (CIPP/US) Sample Questions (Q41-Q46):

NEW QUESTION # 41
What important action should a health care provider take if the she wants to qualify for funds under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH)?

  • A. Send health information and appointment reminders to patients electronically
  • B. Make electronic health records (EHRs) part of regular care
  • C. Keep electronic updates about the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
  • D. Bill the majority of patients electronically for their health care

Answer: B

Explanation:
Explanation/Reference: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20150304.045199/full/


NEW QUESTION # 42
What role does the U.S. Constitution play in the area of workplace privacy?

  • A. It provides legal precedent for physical information security, but not for electronic security
  • B. It provides enforcement resources to large employers, but not to small businesses
  • C. It provides contractual protections to members of labor unions, but not to employees at will
  • D. It provides significant protections to federal and state governments, but not to private-sector employment

Answer: D

Explanation:
The U.S. Constitution plays a limited role in the area of workplace privacy, because it mainly applies to the actions of the government, not private employers. The Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures1. The Supreme Court has interpreted this right to include a reasonable expectation of privacy in certain situations, such as in one's home, car, or personal belongings2. However, this right does not extend to private-sector employees, who are not protected by the Constitution from the actions of their employers, unless the employer is acting as an agent of the government3. Private-sector employees may have some privacy rights under state laws, common law, or contractual agreements, but these vary depending on the jurisdiction and the circumstances4.
Public-sector employees, on the other hand, are protected by the Constitution from unreasonable searches and seizures by their employers, who are considered part of the government. Public-sector employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their workplace, unless there is a legitimate work-related reason for the search or seizure, such as to ensure safety, security, or efficiency. Public-sector employers must also comply with the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, which prohibit the government from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, or from denying any person the equal protection of the laws. These clauses protect public-sector employees from arbitrary or discriminatory actions by their employers that affect their employment status or benefits.
Therefore, the U.S. Constitution plays a significant role in the area of workplace privacy for federal and state governments, but not for private-sector employment, because it only regulates the actions of the government, not private actors. References:
* 1: Cornell Law School, Fourth Amendment, https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution
/fourth_amendment
* 2: FindLaw, What Is a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy?, https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal- rights/what-is-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy.html
* 3: FindLaw, Workplace Privacy, https://www.findlaw.com/smallbusiness/employment-law-and-human- resources/workplace-privacy.html
* 4: Nolo, Privacy Rights of Employees, https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/privacy-rights- employees-29849.html
* : OPM, Employee Relations, https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/employee-relations/reference- materials/employee-privacy/
* : Cornell Law School, Fifth Amendment, https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/fifth_amendment
* : FindLaw, Public Employees and the Constitution, https://www.findlaw.com/employment/employment- rights/public-employees-and-the-constitution.html


NEW QUESTION # 43
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:
You are the chief privacy officer at HealthCo, a major hospital in a large U.S. city in state A. HealthCo is a HIPAA-covered entity that provides healthcare services to more than 100,000 patients. A third-party cloud computing service provider, CloudHealth, stores and manages the electronic protected health information (ePHI) of these individuals on behalf of HealthCo. CloudHealth stores the data in state B. As part of HealthCo's business associate agreement (BAA) with CloudHealth, HealthCo requires CloudHealth to implement security measures, including industry standard encryption practices, to adequately protect the data. However, HealthCo did not perform due diligence on CloudHealth before entering the contract, and has not conducted audits of CloudHealth's security measures.
A CloudHealth employee has recently become the victim of a phishing attack. When the employee unintentionally clicked on a link from a suspicious email, the PHI of more than 10,000 HealthCo patients was compromised. It has since been published online. The HealthCo cybersecurity team quickly identifies the perpetrator as a known hacker who has launched similar attacks on other hospitals - ones that exposed the PHI of public figures including celebrities and politicians.
During the course of its investigation, HealthCo discovers that CloudHealth has not encrypted the PHI in accordance with the terms of its contract. In addition, CloudHealth has not provided privacy or security training to its employees. Law enforcement has requested that HealthCo provide its investigative report of the breach and a copy of the PHI of the individuals affected.
A patient affected by the breach then sues HealthCo, claiming that the company did not adequately protect the individual's ePHI, and that he has suffered substantial harm as a result of the exposed data. The patient's attorney has submitted a discovery request for the ePHI exposed in the breach.
What is the most significant reason that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) might impose a penalty on HealthCo?

  • A. Because HIPAA requires the imposition of a fine if a data breach of this magnitude has occurred
  • B. Because HealthCo did not conduct due diligence to verify or monitor CloudHealth's security measures
  • C. Because HealthCo did not require CloudHealth to implement appropriate physical and administrative measures to safeguard the ePHI
  • D. Because CloudHealth violated its contract with HealthCo by not encrypting the ePHI

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to the HIPAA Security Rule, covered entities are responsible for ensuring that their business associates comply with the security standards and safeguards required by the rule. This includes conducting due diligence to assess the business associate's security capabilities and practices, and monitoring their performance and compliance. Failure to do so may result in a violation of the rule and a penalty by the HHS.
In this scenario, HealthCo did not perform due diligence on CloudHealth before entering the contract, and did not conduct audits of CloudHealth's security measures. This is the most significant reason why HHS might impose a penalty on HealthCo, as it indicates a lack of oversight and accountability for the protection of ePHI. References:
* HIPAA Security Rule
* HIPAA Business Associate Contracts
* HIPAA Enforcement and Penalties


NEW QUESTION # 44
California's SB 1386 was the first law of its type in the United States to do what?

  • A. Require commercial entities to disclose a security data breach concerning personal information about the state's residents
  • B. Require notification of non-California residents of a breach that occurred in California
  • C. Require state attorney general enforcement of federal regulations against unfair and deceptive trade practices
  • D. Require encryption of sensitive information stored on servers that are Internet connected

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 45
When may a financial institution share consumer information with non-affiliated third parties for marketing purposes?

  • A. After disclosing marketing practices to customers and after giving them an opportunity to opt in.
  • B. After disclosing marketing practices to customers and after giving them an opportunity to opt out.
  • C. After disclosing information-sharing practices to customers and after giving them an opportunity to opt in.
  • D. After disclosing information-sharing practices to customers and after giving them an opportunity to opt out.

Answer: D

Explanation:
According to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and its implementing Regulation P, a financial institution may share consumer information with non-affiliated third parties for marketing purposes only after disclosing its information-sharing practices to customers and after giving them an opportunity to opt out of such sharing. The GLBA defines a customer as a consumer who has a continuing relationship with a financial institution that provides one or more financial products or services to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. A consumer is an individual who obtains or has obtained a financial product or service from a financial institution that is to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, or that individual's legal representative. A non-affiliated third party is any person except a financial institution's affiliate or a person employed jointly by a financial institution and a company that is not the financial institution's affiliate. An affiliate is any company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another company.
The GLBA requires that a financial institution provide a privacy notice to customers: (i) at the time of establishing the customer relationship; (ii) annually during the continuation of the customer relationship; and (iii) before disclosing any nonpublic personal information (NPI) about the customer to any non-affiliated third party, unless an exception applies. The privacy notice must describe the categories of NPI that the financial institution collects and discloses; the categories of affiliates and non-affiliated third parties to whom the financial institution discloses NPI; the categories of NPI disclosed to service providers and joint marketers; the policies and practices with respect to protecting the confidentiality and security of NPI; and the disclosures of NPI to which the customer has a right to opt out. The financial institution must also provide a reasonable means for the customer to opt out of the disclosure of NPI to non-affiliated third parties, such as a check-off box, a reply form, or a toll-free telephone number. The opt-out notice must be clear and conspicuous, and must state that the customer can opt out at any time. The opt-out notice must also explain how the customer can opt out, and the effect of opting out. The financial institution must honor the customer's opt-out direction as soon as reasonably practicable after receiving it, and must not disclose any NPI to which the opt-out applies, unless an exception applies.
The GLBA provides several exceptions to the opt-out requirement, such as when the disclosure of NPI is necessary to effect, administer, or enforce a transaction requested or authorized by the customer; when the disclosure of NPI is required or permitted by law; when the disclosure of NPI is to a consumer reporting agency in accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act; or when the disclosure of NPI is to a person that performs marketing services on behalf of the financial institution or on behalf of the financial institution and another financial institution under a joint marketing agreement. A joint marketing agreement is a formal written contract between a financial institution and any other person under which the parties agree to offer, endorse, or sponsor a financial product or service. The joint marketing agreement must prohibit the other person from using or disclosing the NPI for any purpose other than offering, endorsing, or sponsoring the financial product or service covered by the agreement.
The GLBA also requires that a financial institution provide a privacy notice to consumers who are not customers before disclosing any NPI about the consumer to any non-affiliated third party, unless an exception applies. The financial institution does not need to provide an opt-out notice to consumers who are not customers, unless it has a customer relationship with them. However, if the financial institution establishes a customer relationship with a consumer who was previously not a customer, it must provide a privacy notice and an opt-out notice to the customer as described above.
References:
* Guide to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
* GLBA or FCRA? Data Sharing Between Affiliates and Non-Affiliates
* Existing Privacy Laws Already Regulate Information Sharing
* Why Do Banks Share Your Financial Information and Are They Allowed To?
* [IAPP CIPP/US Certified Information Privacy Professional Study Guide], Chapter 5, pages 161-165.


NEW QUESTION # 46
......

Valid Dumps CIPP-US Ppt: https://www.actualtestsquiz.com/CIPP-US-test-torrent.html

What's more, part of that ActualTestsQuiz CIPP-US dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NFfgoEDJl0YKQLHbjkNOiuP01eDdg0qK

Report this page